![How would you explain Bertrand Russell's paradox that the naive set theory of Frege leads to a contradiction? - Quora How would you explain Bertrand Russell's paradox that the naive set theory of Frege leads to a contradiction? - Quora](https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-0d594098c37367bb5793369d81ce2abe.webp)
How would you explain Bertrand Russell's paradox that the naive set theory of Frege leads to a contradiction? - Quora
![math - Taken partly from an article I just read. Russels paradox is a problem discovered by Bertrand Russel in 1901 when study - devRant math - Taken partly from an article I just read. Russels paradox is a problem discovered by Bertrand Russel in 1901 when study - devRant](https://img.devrant.com/devrant/rant/r_2736715_SNoZD.jpg)
math - Taken partly from an article I just read. Russels paradox is a problem discovered by Bertrand Russel in 1901 when study - devRant
![Logicism. Things from Last Time Axiom of Regularity ( ∀ x)[(Ǝa)(a ϵ x) → (Ǝy)(y ϵ x & ~(Ǝz)(z ϵ x & z ϵ y))] If you have a set x And Logicism. Things from Last Time Axiom of Regularity ( ∀ x)[(Ǝa)(a ϵ x) → (Ǝy)(y ϵ x & ~(Ǝz)(z ϵ x & z ϵ y))] If you have a set x And](https://images.slideplayer.com/26/8829980/slides/slide_7.jpg)
Logicism. Things from Last Time Axiom of Regularity ( ∀ x)[(Ǝa)(a ϵ x) → (Ǝy)(y ϵ x & ~(Ǝz)(z ϵ x & z ϵ y))] If you have a set x And
![paradoxes - What are "sets that don't contain itself" in Russell's paradox? - Mathematics Stack Exchange paradoxes - What are "sets that don't contain itself" in Russell's paradox? - Mathematics Stack Exchange](https://i.stack.imgur.com/M3VN3.png)
paradoxes - What are "sets that don't contain itself" in Russell's paradox? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
![DOC) RUSSELL'S PARADOX, OR DUALITY OF AN EMPTY SET. NEVERTHELESS, THE SET OF ALL SETS EXISTS! | Andrey Ivanov - Academia.edu DOC) RUSSELL'S PARADOX, OR DUALITY OF AN EMPTY SET. NEVERTHELESS, THE SET OF ALL SETS EXISTS! | Andrey Ivanov - Academia.edu](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/47421815/mini_magick20190206-25682-1fcwcdd.png?1549519151)
DOC) RUSSELL'S PARADOX, OR DUALITY OF AN EMPTY SET. NEVERTHELESS, THE SET OF ALL SETS EXISTS! | Andrey Ivanov - Academia.edu
![SOLVED: Cantor's Paradox demonstrates that there is no "set of all sets." We know that every set has a cardinality, so it is natural to ask if there is a set of " SOLVED: Cantor's Paradox demonstrates that there is no "set of all sets." We know that every set has a cardinality, so it is natural to ask if there is a set of "](https://cdn.numerade.com/ask_images/d54aa7817f2249a1a40821c6ca875815.jpg)